MOST COHORTS OF CRYPTOZOOLOGY, HAVE TO FIGHT FOR THEIR CHOSEN FIELD OF STUDY TO BE TAKEN SERISOUSLY AND HAVE OFFERED SOME SEEMINGLY CREDIBLE ARGUEMENTS. THEY ARE AS FOLLOWS.
1. THAT UNTIL THE EARLY 1900'S THE MOUNTAIN GORILLA WAS THOUGHT TO HAVE BEEN A MYTH AND TO HAVE ONLY EXISTED IN STORIES OF THE NATIVES. SO IF THE GORILLA WAS FOUND TO BE A TRUE ANIMAL, THEN IT IS POSSIBLE FOR OTHER ANIMALS AND CREATURES OF MYTH TO EXIST.
2. ANIMALS SUCH AS THE COELACANTH AND THE FRILLED SHARK ARE SAID TO BE LIVING FOSSILS, THOUGHT HAVE GONE EXTINCT MILLIONS OF YEARS AGO. IF THESE ANIMALS ARE ALIVE AND THRIVING TODAY, THEN IT IS POSSIBLE THAT CREATURES SUCH AS THE LOCH NESS MONSTER AND MOKELE MBEMBE COULD POSSIBLY EXIST
3. UNTIL 1976, THE MEGAMOUTH WAS AN UNKOWN FISH CRUISING THE OCEAN. WITH THE OCEAN AS LARGE AS IT IS AND VASTLY UNEXPLORED, THERE ARE BOUND TO BE COUNTLESS SPECIES OF FISH AND DEEP SEA LIFE THAT COULD ACCOUNT FOR SIGHTENINGS OF SEA MONSTERS THAT EXIST TO THIS DAY.
4. IN CORRELATION WITH #3, THERE ARE STILL VAST EXPANSSES OF LAND THAT ARE UNPOPULATED AND LARGELY UNEXPLORED. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THERE HAVE BEEN CREATURES THAT HAVE ELUDED DISCOVERY.
I AM NOT SAYING I AGREE WITH THESE ARGUEMENTS, I AM MERELY STATING THEM FOR DISCUSSION. WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THESE ARGUEMENTS? ARE THEY VALID OR INVALID? PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR THINKING. I DO NOT WANT SIMPLE STATEMENTS, ANYONE CAN STATE THEIR VIEW POINTS, NOT EVERYONE CAN BACK THEM THOUGH. I WILL ADD MY THOUGHTS ON THE SUBJECT IN THE FUTURE.
Subject: ARE THE ARGUMENTS FOR CRYPTOZOOLOGY SOUND? 