TODAY THERE ARE SO MANY FACETS OF THE PARNORMAL THAT STRUGGLE FOR ACCEPTANCE BY THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY. THEY WANT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, YET FAIL TO TAKE EVEN THE MOST BASIC STEPS REQUIRED FOR THAT TO TAKE PLACE, OR ARE MISINFORMED AND ARE USING FAULTY INFORMATION IN ORDER TO GIVE THE SEMBLACE THAT THEIR IDEAS ON THE PARANORMAL ARE OF SCIENTIFIC MERIT.
OFTEN TIMES WHEN FLAWS ARE POINTED OUT, DEFENDERS OF THE PARANORMAL TAKE OFFENSE AND GO INTO ATTACK MODE. THOUGH INSTEAD, THEY SHOULD TAKE WHAT WAS POINTED OUT AND IMPROVE UPON IT. IF IT MEANS BECOMING MORE INFORMED, THEN DO SO. IF IT MEANS TRYING DIFFERENT PROCEDURES BY ALL MEANS RESEARCH AND EMPLOY NEW ONES. SCIENCE ISNT PERFECT, ANY SCIENTIST WILL BE THE FIRST TO ADMIT IT. THEY TRY AND FAIL, CHANGE REPEAT. DO BELIEVERS IN THE PARANORMAL THINK THAT THEY WILL GET IT ALL RIGHT THE FIRST TIME? I CERTAINLY HOPE NOT, WOULD BE RATHER ARROGANT OF THEM.
WHEN THESE FLAWS ARE POINTED OUT AND ACTION ISNT TAKEN TO CORRECT THEM THEN THE SAME FLAWED PROCEDURES ARE USED TIME AFTER TIME, ITS NO WONDER THAT PARANORMAL INVESTIGATORS ARE SCOFFED AT. IT ONLY SHOWS IGNORANCE AND KEEPS THEM CHASING THEIR TAILS AND GETTING NOWHERE.
TRUE SOME PEOPLE DONT CLAIM TO WANT SCIENTIFIC BACKING, THAT THEY DO WHAT THEY DO FOR THE SHEER EXCITEMENT OF IT ALL. IF THAT IS THE CASE THEN THIS SECTION ISNT FOR YOU.
THIS SECTION IS FOR THE SHARING OF SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION IN ORDER TO HAVE A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORLD AROUND US AND PERHAPS LEAD US TO BETTER AND TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS WHEN IT COMES TO THE PARANORMAL RATHER THAN RELYING ON ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, AND AN OVERABUNDANCE OF DATA THAT HAS NO REAL MEANING.